Start by searching for a number
| Ratings | |
|---|---|
| Hazard level: | |
| Number of ratings: | 1× |
| Latest rating: | Apr 22, 2016 Add comment |
| Views | |
|---|---|
| Number of views: | 19× |
| Last viewed: | Jul 21, 2021 |
Tip: Try out our new Call Insider app. You can download it for free on Google Play.
Who creates the database and how is the trustworthiness of the comments ensured?
The phone number database and ratings are created by the users themselves. They can add their reviews either through the website or through the Call Insider app.
Comments are posted by the users of the website anonymously, so it is not possible to ensure their 100% trustworthiness. We, of course, get requests to remove comments on phone numbers stating that they are a tool of competition and they have been fabricated. We, therefore, reserve the right to delete comments or even disable comments for a particular number.
Every user can deactivate any comment until the moderators deal with it. Just click the bin icon in the bottom right corner, fill in a short form and confirm the email address where a statement on how the moderators dealt with the comment will be sent.
Mobile phone operators are exploring deploying artificial intelligence (AI)-led interventions to address the issue of pesky calls, with some saying they may even extend the blockchain-based solution currently being used for messages to calling.
Sunak government could ‘swiftly’ end spoofing calls, says Emily Thornberry in criticism of delayed fraud strategy. Labour has pledged a crackdown on global scammers who call UK phone numbers to con people out of their money, and criticised the government for a five-month delay in producing a new fraud strategy.
USA
They called my residence. After advising that the call may be recorded they refused to identify themselves or what the matter pertained to since I was not the person they wished to speak with.
Neutral Apr 22, 2016 00